Guideline for Avoiding Overlapping
In close consultation with a
number of POs, PKSF has recently formulated a policy to avoid overlapping. The
main features of the policy are as follows:
Definition of overlapping
When a household
receives microcredit from more than one institution, this will be treated as an
instance of overlapping although the same household can establish links with
more than one service providing institution/agency without being branded so.
Therefore, in case of microcredit, one household will be able to receive credit
from only institution.
Policies to avoid existing
overlapping
(a)
The
microcredit institutions working in a particular village must posses the list
of their respective samities/groups along with list of their members, their
date of joining, household number and address. The application for membership
should contain the photograph of the applicant. Once enrolled, the member
should have an identity card containing his/her photograph in it.
(b)
The
microcredit institutions working in a particular village must exchange the list
of their respective borrowers once in every three months. The exchange of the
list may be done quicker, if necessary, in the village where overlapping
allegedly exists.
(c)
There
should be a thana level forum of the microcredit institutions the members of
which should meet initially once in every month and later once in every three
months to regularly review the situation and take appropriate action to stop
overlapping and its recurrence in future.
If the problem still remains
unresolved, the matter should be referred to their respective head offices. If
still unresolved, the issue may be discussed with PKSF.
(d)
A
list of those members from the same village who have received microcredit from
and/or accumulated savings in more than one agency would be prepared and,
subject to discussion with the concerned members, they would be allowed to stay
with the organization they prefer. However, the concerned members will have to
repay all debts to the organization they are leaving and obtain a clearance
certificate from it.
(e)
In
order to check if any member received microcredit from more than one agency,
the microcredit field staff or officers of the agencies may attend the weekly
meetings of centers/samities of one another.
(f) A special seal will be
stamped on the Pass Book of the member who received loans from more than one
source so that the member can be easily identified. However, caution will have
to be applied to avoid negative influence on the concerned borrower.
(g)
The field workers of the local branch of the microcredit institutions
must be fully aware of the list of borrowers that received credit from more
than one source and the concerned official would motivate the concerned
borrowers to repay loans of the other institution in addition to his/her own.
After the loan is repaid, action as per d above would follow.
Policies to avoid future
overlapping
(a)
The
members organized by one organization cannot be taken over by another
organization without prior consultation with the concerned organization.
(b)
The
practice of waiting for credit by the borrowers after being organized must be
uniform for all the agencies working in a village. In this case duration of
waiting varies from 8 to 12 weeks. The members or potential borrowers who
failed to receive credit from one organization even after waiting for 12 weeks
may be taken over by another organization but in that case they will have to
wait for another 8 to 12 weeks under the new organization to receive credit.
(c)
The
list of new members along with their addresses of one organization must be
circulated to other organizations working in the same village. If no objection
is received within 15 days of the circulation, it would be safely assumed that
the enlisted people are not members of any other organization and hence the
list is final. The persons about whom objection have been received should be absorbed
by any of the organizations after mutual discussion. If needed, a household may
be provided with a maximum of two loans simultaneously to overcome the
situation.
(d)
The
member who has just started savings under one organization and was subsequently
found to have already received loan from another organization, should receive
immediate refund of his/her saved amount along with cancellation of membership.
(e)
The
local level officers of the organizations will hold monthly review meetings at
the thana forum. The unresolved issues of that review meeting should be
referred to higher authorities of the concerned organizations to resolve before
the next meeting. If still not resolved, this should be informed to PKSF in
black and white.
(f)
Since
microcredit is targeted to the poor, there should be uniformity in the maximum
size of the first loan in the loan products under it. Here in this case the
maximum size of the first loan should be Tk. 4,000 irrespective of the
organization delivering it. This can, however, be enhanced in future to take
care of inflation. This ceiling can be exceeded for microcredit under special
program.
(g)
While
considering inclusion of new POs, PKSF would look into the number of other
microcredit institutions and their program in the concerned area.
No comments:
Post a Comment